The Nepalese living goddess Sajani Shakya, who was fired from her post for leaving the country and going to the United States, is about to be reinstated after undergoing purity rituals.
Category Archives: Religion
Money is no compensation
The LA archdiocese of the Catholic Church is to pay an average of $1.3m (E940,000) to each of the 500 people involved in claims of sexual abuse.
Once this $660m settlement is complete the Church in the US will have paid TWO BILLION DOLLARS since 1950. It’ll take much more than a few extra collections at Sunday Mass to cover that.
I’m not bitter. I’m angry.
For decades perverted priests destroyed children’s innocence, irreparably scarring untold numbers of people. For some the trauma was too much and the ensuing depression and guilt — because many victims feel guilty — saw them take their own lives. I don’t think we will ever know the full extent of clerical sex abuse.
Head of the archdiocese Cardinal Roger Mahony told the faithful:
There really is no way to go back and give them that innocence that was taken from them. The one thing I wish I could give the victims … I cannot. Once again, I apologize to anyone who has been offended, who has been abused. It should not have happened, and it will not happen again.
These words are not enough. I am willing to accept they are sincere — even if Mahony’s reputation is tarnished by claims he protected a priest who molested 20 children, including a nine-month-old baby (he says he did not know the man was a paedophile — but they still ring hollow given the scale of the issue.
Giving money to the victims, while certainly making their lives easier, can never compensate for abuse of trust and body. Besides, the Church isn’t even stumping up all of the cash.
Archdiocese attorney Michael Hennigan said:
The archdiocese will pay $250 million, insurance carriers will pay a combined $227 million and several religious orders will chip in $60 million. The remaining $123 million will come from litigation with religious orders that chose not to participate in the deal, with the archdiocese guaranteeing resolution of those 80 to 100 cases within five years
I don’t recall when the sex abuse scandals first came to the popular Irish consciousness. In fact I have been aware of it for so long there are times I forget it was not a problem isolated to my island nation.
Perhaps the most damning case was that of Ferns diocese. A report by the government identified more than 100 allegations of child sexual abuse made between 1962 and 2002 against 21 priests. It found the Church authorities failed to tackle the problem after they became aware of it, while the police failed to properly investigate complaints.
The inquiry also found Bishop Donal J Herlihy treated claims of sex abuse by priests in his diocese as a moral problem.
In his defence, I must point out that by 1980 he realised there was a psychological element; however, he still appointed these priests to posts for which they were unsuitable.
The worst cretin to have served in the diocese was Seán Fortune. This serial child molester, who killed himself in 1999 while awaiting trial on 66 counts of abuse involving 29 boys (although I can’t say they were all in Ferns), had a reputation for abuse since his days at the seminary. The 2002 BBC documentary Suing the Pope traced his legacy and ultimately led to the Ferns Report.
One diocese. More than 100 claims of abuse. I’m sure you begin to understand why I feel the true extent of clerical sex abuse will never be known.
These priests — and we should never make the mistake of thinking all priests would do this — were put in a position of trust and took advantage of it in the most horrific way they could.
The Church teaches forgiveness, but how can it expect these priests to be granted such a mercy? Should a victim forgive his abuser, he or she is a bigger person than I.
Sacred Destinations
For those of you with a more spiritual yearning, this may be the site for you (courtesy of Digg).
Sacred-destinations.com is a guide to more than 1,300 sacred sites, holy places, religious buildings, religious artifacts, and pilgrimage destinations in 55 countries.
The site contains maps and travel guides, and is searchable by country or theme. It’s worth checking out even if you’re just interested in travel, architecture and humanity’s urge to discover or honour something beyond the physical realm.
The logic train doesn't stop here
Nepal has fired a living goddess for the heinous, nigh unspeakable crime of visiting the United States.
You read that correctly.
Sajani Shakya is/was one of several kumari, a role held in high esteem by both Hindus and Buddhists. Kumari are chosen between the ages of two and four and stay in the role until they hit puberty. The main kumari is largely kept out of sight in a temple in Kathmandu, although Sajani was allowed to attend school and stay at home.
Although she wasn’t the top kumari, she was high enough in rank to mean she was barred from leaving the country. However, last month she went to several nations promoting a documentary about the living goddesses. Blogger and internet cool dude Andy Carvin met the gadget-loving Sajani during her trip — read about it here.
This AP report quotes officials as saying she was removed from her post for “breaking with tradition”. A task force is now seeking — yes, you also read THAT correctly — a new kumari.
How does one fire a goddess? Surely they are what they are, and no committee or government department can decide otherwise (although they do decide who the kumari is depending on tests and various criteria).
Nepalese teaching is that these girls are incarnations of the goddess Taleju, who supposedly leaves the child’s body when she has her first period or suffers serious injury/illness.
I claim no great understanding of Hindu or Buddhist teaching. But what has menstruation got to do with sanctity? Who decided the living goddesses are no longer goddesses after this point?
Out and about
Egypt has freed a blogger who was detained more than a month ago for being a member of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Abdel Moneim Mahmoud, who is also a correspondent for British-based Arabic television channel al-Hewar, had not officially been charged. He had been detained along with 23 others, who were also set free.
Human rights group the El Nadim Center has claimed Mahmoud was taken into custody because of “the role he played in exposing crimes committed by the Ministry of the Interior through his blog, where he called for the release of detainees”.
The organisation also points out that Mahmoud took part in media activities arranged by Amnesty International after that group released a report documenting torture in Egyptian police stations.
The Muslim Brotherhood advocates an Islamic state — and let me state quite clearly that I support complete separation of clergy and state — but with democratic reforms Egypt needs.
For example, Egyptian presidents, with whom almost all power rests, have typically been elected in single-candidate votes since the country became a republic in the 1950s. September 2005 saw the first multi-party presidential vote; however, candidates were screened by an electoral commission which only allowed 10 of the 30 applicants to run. The Muslim Brotherhood, which has the broadest support of the opposition groups, had no candidate.
Unsurprisingly, Hosni Mubarack was re-elected.
A March 2007 referendum — which Amnesty International said represented the biggest erosion of human rights since 1981, when emergency laws were introduced following the assassination of Anwar Sadat — gave the president the power to dissolve parliament.
It also prohibited parties using religion as a basis of political activity, ended judicial supervision of elections and allowed for civilians to be tried by military courts in terrorism cases.
Isn’t politics fun?
Conflict of interests
The Virginian-Pilot has an interesting biog-piece on Marcus Ross, who holds a doctorate in geosciences yet is also a creationist. I like how the spark for his internal debate was the fact he liked dinosaurs while being raised a Christian fundamentalist. His 197-page thesis was described by his supervisor as “impeccable”, yet Ross doesn’t believe a word of it.