Archive for July, 2007

Jul 31 2007

More articles

Work has been the priority and the long hours have left little time for blogging… but here’s what I’ve been reading in recent days (not all of it has made it to my del.icio.us feed).

CNet: The Microsoft albatross. Don Reisinger says the company needs to abandon Windows after creating one more operating system.

Earth2Tech: EcoWeb tool, LocalCooling.com. The site says its downloadable power-saving software optimises your PC’s power consumption through what it says is a “more effective” power saving mode. I haven’t tried it out yet so I can’t say if it’s too good to be true or a revelation.

Scientific American: Why we quit. A look at why more US college students drop out than graduate.

International Herald Tribune: Murdoch set to win control of Wall Street Journal. A story which was also reported in the Journal.

Harry McGee: The line is going to be Brian. Why Irish politics is going to revolve around the Finance Minister and heir apparent to Bertie Ahern’s throne.

No responses yet

Jul 31 2007

Free books!

New York Public Library has installed a book-on-demand machine and they’ll print any of over 200,000 public domain titles from the Open Content Alliance free of charge for any patron.

The titles include Moby Dick, The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and A Christmas Carol. Classics all. Now why oh why can’t we get a system like this going in Ireland?

No responses yet

Jul 28 2007

Curiosities

Interesting stories I’ve read in the past few hours (Una does this style of post more regularly and far better than I):

LiveScience.com: Ancient Egyptian may have had the world’s first prosthetic toe. (With pic!)

San Francisco Chronicle: Hackers crack all models of electronic voting machine in California. More reasons the system will never get going in Ireland.

RawStory.com: Michael Moore served with a subpoena while backstage at the Jay Leno show.

Treehugger.com: Architect Shigeru Ban builds a bridge out of cardboard tubes. It’s in France and can hold the weight of 20 people at any given time.

Catholicgauze: The future of mapmaking. Points to two excellent articles on how customised dynamic maps are transforming cartography.

Associated Press: YouTube’s system to stop copyright-infringing videos.

Reuters: Dumbass shoplifter leaves address with the shop assistant.

No responses yet

Jul 28 2007

Arms deal

The Bush administration wants Congress to approve a $20 billion (E14.65bn) arms package for Saudi Arabia.

The deal would include satellite-guided bombs and upgrades to fighter planes and warships, but pale in comparison to the $30bn package in the offing for Israel.

Such sales are part of life. Countries want to improve their defence forces and companies want to make a few quid. But this is a political deal, something The New York Times buried a few paragraphs into the story.

[Bush] officials said the plan to bolster the militaries of Persian Gulf countries is part of an American strategy to contain the growing power of Iran in the region and to demonstrate that, no matter what happens in Iraq, Washington remains committed to its longtime Arab allies.

Later in the story:

Along with Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are likely to receive equipment and weaponry from the arms sales under consideration, officials said. In general, the United States is interested in upgrading the countries’ air and missile defense systems, improving their navies and making modest improvements in their air forces, administration officials said, though not all the packages would be the same.

Saudi Arabia isn’t looking for the weaponry. The materiel is being offered to it, clearly with the expectation the Saudis will jump at the opportunity. An agreement is expected in the autumn.

I actually laughed at this paragraph:

Worried about the impression that the United States was starting an arms race in the region, State and Defense Department officials stressed that the arms deal was being proposed largely in response to improvements in Iran’s military capabilities and to counter the threat posed by its nuclear program, which the Bush administration contends is aimed at building nuclear weapons.

How on Earth is pumping billions of dollars into several nations’ militaries not starting an arms race? Iran’s nuclear ambitions are a matter of debate, although it has signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, unlike India with which the US signed a nuclear deal earlier this week.

Economic and political interests are driving this deal. Selling $20bn of arms to Saudi Arabia will go some way toward redressing the balance of trade between the countries — a balance of trade in favour of the Saudis due to oil exports. A strong US relationship with the kingdom is one way to ensure future supplies of black gold, even if these will be exhausted in a few decades.

America has a long-standing relationship with Israel, which explains the arms offer to that nation. Unfortunately, this deal between allies runs the risk of fueling regional tensions.

Of course, there’s no guarantee the Middle Eastern countries will accept the arms packages. It will be interesting to see what the deals entail for individual states.

No responses yet

Jul 28 2007

Right royal kerfuffle

Published by David O'Mahony under Middle East, Oddities, Travel

Three female members of the Qatari royal family delayed a flight for four hours because they wouldn’t sit next to strangers.

From BBC:

The three wives of Sheikh Badr Bin Khalifa al-Thani refused take up their seats on board Flight 563 from Milan’s Linate airport to London Heathrow.

Police and Qatari diplomats became involved before the captain told Sheikh Badr’s entourage to leave the aircraft.

The Qatari royals eventually ended up getting an Alitalia flight to London.

The story doesn’t mention if there was a religious/cultural basis for the dispute, merely that the women refused to sit next to men they didn’t know. Can anybody add some detail to the story?

No responses yet

Jul 28 2007

Mass medication

Polly Curtis of The Guardian has an interesting news piece in today’s edition. Roger Boyle, who is the British government’s health tsar, wants every man over 50 to take anti-cholesterol drugs on a daily basis.

Us menfolks aren’t the only ones coming in for scrutiny: he says all women over 60 should be given statins too. He says this would save hundreds of thousands of lives from cardiovascular disease.

Professor Boyle, the Department of Health’s well-respected national director for heart disease, said the benefits of the cholesterol-busting drugs were proven and the side-effects were among the mildest of any drug. But he said the current method of identifying those at risk was long-winded and meant some people could be waiting too long to take statins.

However, he points out that the public isn’t ready for this blanket approach and that choice is “still an important thing”.

I don’t know how I’d react if I was told: “You’re a certain age, now start taking your pills.” I’d probably freak and refuse to take them on general principal (nothing breeds defiance like being told what to do). But if it can stave off the risk of heart disease with only the mildest of side-effects it might be a course worth pursuing.

I can see the logic in Prof Boyle’s proposal. It would save lives — many, many lives. As a physician employed to oversee strategies to safeguard his nation’s health, this is Boyle’s priority. But it would override the basis of a free society: choice. Acceptance of this policy would require a revolution in cultural thought.

That said, there are ways to accommodate it without coming off as tyrannical. Merely making the drugs available free of charge for all men over 50 would help encourage use without making people feel as if they had to take them. It won’t save lives on the scale envisaged by Boyle but it would save more than the current medication regime does (about 10,000 according to The Guardian).

Of course, this is Britain. Other nations may feel more accommodating to mass medication with statins.

In fairness to Boyle, he’s thinking big. That’s his job. It’s refreshing to see suggestions that would work on a national scale rather than getting bogged down in regional concerns.

Will his proposal ever come off? Not in its current form. But with a few tweaks and moderations, it may be the way forward for state-backed healthcare. A way forward, at least.

No responses yet

Jul 28 2007

Darfur peace report

The International Crisis Group has published a report on a strategy for peace in Sudan. While essentially calling on the nation’s government to implement the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement, the group makes several worthwhile recommendations.

What caught my interest the most is that the first one is for the government to cease harassment of journalists. I know this is navel-gazing, but they list the removal of media restrictions ahead of releasing political prisoners. It’s all lumped in to one paragraph but the way it is structured perturbs me.

I support a free media and recognise the role it plays in exposing human rights abuses and corruption. However, I would rank freeing those jailed for their political beliefs ahead of us journos. Am I right or wrong? Are they matters of equal importance, reflecting aspects of the same crackdown?

Regardless, the report is worth a read and can be found here.

No responses yet

Jul 27 2007

Contract

Published by David O'Mahony under Blogging, Life

I have signed a contract with the Irish Examiner. As this blog isn’t a commercial entity and doesn’t focus on the Irish media, there is unlikely to be a conflict of interest. Which is nice.

No responses yet

Jul 27 2007

Breaking wind

Some good news on the climate front and an opportunity for a childish giggle (it’s my birthday, allow me these little foibles).

Latest figures show 15,200 megawatts of wind turbines were installed worldwide last year. This increased global wind power capacity 26% to more than 74,200 megawatts, enough to offset 43 million tons of carbon dioxide (or that produced by 8m cars).

Granted there is a long, long way to go before CO2 output is properly capped. The 43m tonnes is only 5% of global emissions. It is progress though — and it’s heartening to see that China is likely to be the world’s top wind power producer in a few years. Also, a researcher involved in the study claims wind could reduce CO2 emission growth by 2015.

Spain last week authorised the development of wind farms along its coastline, while Denmark is aiming to provide 50% of its electricty from wind turbines.

As the supermarket ad says, every little bit helps.

One response so far

Jul 27 2007

Interesting articles

Published by David O'Mahony under Blogging

They stimulated my brain cells anyway. Here are several interesting blogicles I’ve stumbled across on my recent travels:

Mental_floss: How to join the Amish. A wry, at-a-glance piece on just what’s required.
Celsias: Outdoor heaters warming the world literally. The amount of carbon dioxide from patio heaters in Scotland is the equivalent to that produced by more than 1,200 homes.

Anthropology.net: If upright walking is so energetically favourable, why do apes still “knuckle-walk”? Current research suggests humans learned to walk upright to conserve energy. Kambiz Kamrani answers the question creationists keep asking.

Compiler: It’s sink or swim time for Thunderbird. Mozilla’s chief executive is ready to cut the email app loose so it can be run by a different entity.

AlertNet: 200,000 displaced, scores killed by floods in Sudan. As if they didn’t have enough to worry about… written by Red Cross/Crescent personnel in the country.

Danger Room: Drunk astronauts launched into space. A NASA panel found that drunken astronauts were allowed to fly despite warnings about their alcohol consumption. *sigh*

Engadget: European Commission files antitrust charges against Intel. For using “illegal tactics” against AMD.

Climate Feedback: Google turns to the dark side. Apparently some people claim it would save a lot of energy if high-traffic website such as Google changed their background colour from white to black. However, this is disputed…  curious though.

No responses yet

Next »