Monthly Archives: June 2007

Please indulge me for a moment

I know this is especially childish of me, but please allow me just this one moment of mild insanity after hearing Paris Hilton is going back to jail for her full 45-day term:

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

*ahem*

I thank you for your patience.

teeheehee.

Sorry. That one just slipped out.

On a serious note, allowing her to escape her punishment would be wrong, oh so very wrong. Nobody else would be allowed home from prison after three days just because he or she wasn’t adjusting very well. The lack of documentation to support this “medical reason” leads me to suspect it wasn’t valid to begin with.

Tough shit, Paris. Welcome to real life.

God frickin’ damn it

Sean Connery has announced he will not be in the long-awaited Indiana Jones IV. The veteran Scot apparently told the Lucasfilm website (although I can’t find the interview):

“I thought long and hard about it, and if anything could have pulled me out of retirement it would have been an Indiana Jones film. I love working with Steven and George, and it goes without saying that it is an honour to have Harrison as my son. But in the end, retirement is just too damned much fun.”

You bastard, Sean.

The film begins shooting this month and should be out in May 2008. It’ll star Cate Blanchett and John Hurt as well as the whip-cracking 64-year-old Harrison Ford.

Diana documentary

I bought into the hype and controversy and watched Diana: The Witnesses In the Tunnel. What crap. I can’t believe photographs showing such little detail and of such poor quality caused so much controversy. While I have no doubt that this was upsetting for Britain’s princes, as a viewer I have to say I was completely underwhelmed.

It’s all kicking off

Turkish troops have entered Iraq in a move that can not be good for anyone.

No Turkish official is willing to put their name to the story confirming the operation, while the Foreign Minister has openly denied anything happened. But as Selcan Hacaoglu of the Associated Press notes, the nation’s authorities rarely acknowledge such activity.

Estimates of the number of troops ranges from thousands to several hundred — initial speculation put the figure at 50,000, which was the case in 1997 — but what runs consistent is that the military is pursuing Kurdish fighters.

It may only have been a couple of miles across the frontier, but it is troubling.

The military has for some time been pushing for a large-scale incursion to tackle the Kurdish separatists, the PKK, which Turkey considers terrorists. The Turkish army has been massing along the border in preparation; last week the country’s top general, Yasar Buyukanit, said his forces were awaiting government permission to cross into Iraq.

Turkey’s alliance with the US will grant it some degree of protection should it decide to step up its campaign against the PKK, which launches attacks from bases in Iraq. However, a full-scale incursion can only add to Iraq’s instability.

The introduction of this hostile actor in such a volatile stage will have unpredictable and uncontrollable results. The Kurds — who dwell in a stretch of territory that includes south-eastern Turkey and northern Iraq — will be squeezed into a corner. The Iraqi government will be in an intolerable position: if it allows a Turkish incursion its claim to govern its national territory will be null and void, while if it resists it faces provoking a conflict with its neighbour.

I am struck by the absence of international condemnation.

Imagine the outcry if the US was pushing for a military operation inside Canada, or China in Japan, or Britain in Ireland.