Monthly Archives: October 2007

Another reason not to use Vista

From APCmag.com:

Something as small as swapping the video card or updating a device driver can trigger a total Vista deactivation.

Put simply, your copy of Windows will stop working with very little notice (three days) and your PC will go into “reduced functionality” mode, where you can’t do anything but use the web browser for half an hour.

You’ll then need to reapply to Microsoft to get a new activation code.

Read the full story here.

I’ll be sticking with XP.  Sometimes I wonder how a company with so many intelligent employees can make such stupid mistakes.

Links o' the day

The Levi-Prodi law and the end of the Internet. A draft law in Italy would require anyone with a blog or a website to register it with the government, produce certificates and pay taxes.

Shannon and the DAA. Seems the Dublin Airport Authority knew about the Aer Lingus plan to scrap the Shannon-Heathrow route but neglected to tell the Shannon Airport Authority.

BT bets big on wind power. I don’t blame them.

Are these 10 common money mistakes keeping you poor? Bet your sweet ass they are, or at least not making things any easier for you.

Immigration, assimilation and identity in geopolitics. As Louisiana elects its first non-white governor in a century, Switzerland elects racists.

Putting a local spin on social networking.

Iran’s leadership battles. Ahmadinejad and Khamenei are at loggerheads.

Setting a high target

Slashdot reports that Facebook is moving to 64-bit user IDs. At the moment they’re using 32-bit, which allows 4.3bn profiles. One writer opines:

Despite having only 47 million users today, Facebook’s move to 64 bits will allow it to have more than 18 quintillion (18,446,744,074,000,000,000) user accounts. Of course, there are currently only about 6.5 billion people in the world. Is Facebook setting their sights beyond Earth or just trying to avoid what happened when Slashdot ran out of space for comment IDs last year? Perhaps they are planning to implement personas.

Read the story here.

Kicking email to the kerb (kind of)

Intel has joined the “no-email day” brigade. Although it’s not banned, the company is encouraging workers to actually talk to each other.

In Intel’s case the push to look again at the culture of e-mail followed a comment from chief executive Paul Otellini criticising engineers “who sit two cubicles apart sending an e-mail rather than get up and talk”.

A tutor I had a few years ago used to freak out over this kind of thing. He was the editor of an evening paper and had an office next to the editor of the morning paper — a man who insisted on sending memos to people instead of speaking face to face.

According to US research firm The Radicati Group, individual workers sent an average of 37 e-mails a day in 2006 with predictions this will rise to 47 by the end of this year.

Another study conducted by researchers at the Universities of Glasgow and Paisley found that one third of users felt stressed by the heavy volume of e-mail they had to deal with.

When e-mail behaviour was tracked it is was found that many were checking their inbox as often as 30 to 40 times per hour.

Does having Gmail open in a tab count as checking it 30 to 40 times per hour? And who sends an average of 37 emails a day? Either it’s pretty hectic business or I’m just jealous of their popularity.

While no-email Friday sounds interesting, some industry figures have pointed out it just means more work to catch up on on Monday.

I like the idea — it’s far too easy to get complacent and stop communicating directly with one another. I know I’m just as guilty of this as most people but it’s nice to think I can change, even if just a little bit.
Story pointed out to me by the wonderful Lucy.